|
30 posts
24 May
-
18:49
In reply to Only white people break Inverted KKK, the flip side of the binary, no? reply
-
18:42
In reply to Why They Break Windows Only white people break windows and riot, cause they have priviledge. There has never been a non-white riot. Because of priviledge. reply
-
18:39
In reply to Pretty misleading, amirite? Wow, you express yourself like a stone skipping over a political ideological pond of excrement, staccato fashion! Should I respond with an individual autonomous drum solo to purify the air? (...)
-
17:59
In reply to McKenzie Wark's Stunted Publicity O.D. I was supporting you against the racist anonymous guy. Those insults were directed at him not you. I meant I didn't agree with what you said about Debord before, further back in the comments. (...)
-
17:56
In reply to McKenzie Wark's Stunted Publicity I was just facing answers to me as : "you cheese-eating surrender monkey Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/23/2013 - 18:26 you'd all be speaking German if it wasn't for us. So. . . zip it!" then : "we don't eat (...)
-
17:45
In reply to I seriously Pretty misleading, amirite? What are these anarcho-police you refer to? Sources? They lost because of Stalin, and I'd suggest because the CNT could have abolished the government in Madrid but chose not to. Stalin worked behind the scenes to turn a social (...)
-
17:41
In reply to Why They Break Windows Police Planet has replaced Earth as the name for our cosmic sanctuary. reply
-
17:38
In reply to Time for some corrections Let's get one thing clear. If burrito-throwing is "brutal, violent opposition" than ya'll need a serious wake-up about what the response will be if you ever do the DEW. Speaking of the "sanctity" of an organization pretty much already puts at (...)
-
17:14
In reply to compañeros Never been to Seattle, la mierda que usted no me conoce, no soy un gringo. I'm also not asking for fucking support in Seattle - but never mind I forgot no good intentions go unpunished on this site. Sorry you had such a fucked experience in Seattle. (...)
-
17:06
In reply to Anarchism&the 'left': beyond redemption? I seriously question your definition of 'anarchist' and suspect that you use the term loosely in the leftist vernacular ('verna', latin, homeborn slave) (...)
23 May
-
19:43
In reply to Why Did DGR Do It? I heard recently that email scammers try to make their scams really obvious so that only the most gullible people reply. That way they don't waste time talking to people who will smell a rat and back out when they start hearing the details. I wonder if there (...)
-
19:42
In reply to this operationist person Yes, I have a twitter, a system of communication which exists on the internet, entirely separate from the comments feed of anarchistnews, surely. It says anarchist in the name, we can only presume that what is conveyed through this conduit is thus of a (...)
-
19:33
In reply to ^ Big ups to this post, nail ^This^ ^This^ ^This^ ^This^ Both of these posts are spot on. reply
-
19:11
In reply to You are mistaking "radical I really wish we could get our terms straight here. It pains me to see people with decent analysis give people like Keith, Brennan, etc cover by using this term. The name is fucking taken. It would be one thing if there was some kind of open, knowing (...)
-
18:58
In reply to Who's Missing the Point? Just because you say you aren't essentialist doesn't make you not essentialist, just because you say you hate the binary doesn't mean you don't support the binary. Radfems consistently defend the binary and essentialism at every turn (...)
-
18:34
In reply to The Abolition of Wark Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying, the modern pro-situ is quite well beholden to its capacity to trudge the situationist critique of the pro-situ to no ends for purposes of its self perpetuation. You need to fuel these petty little scandals; without (...)
-
18:25
In reply to The offspring of the rich self-immolate yourself out of ⓐnews reply
-
18:12
In reply to This is a terrifyingly what exactly do you mean by "total control"? Derrick, under certain circumstances, clarifying the organizational intentions of the group that he created? no one is forced to join DGR or prevented from leaving if they disagree with the group's methodology. (...)
-
18:06
In reply to We do so nice of you to grace us helpless children with your adult presence. reply
-
18:04
In reply to AGF: Fire To The Condos! The offspring of the rich would do the proletariat a bigger favor by engaging in self-immolation. reply
-
01:32
In reply to A stunning victory for the McKenzie Wark IS the post modern pro-situ milieu. Postmodernism is his context and the lense through which he interprets the SI. Ironically, the outcry against Herr Werk isn't really about the SI. It is about the critique of capitalism that the SI (...)
-
01:29
In reply to McKenzie Wark's Stunted Publicity He publishes his articles in respected newspapers, not on waste my time anarchist websites like this one. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/22/google-information-t... Go to his Twitter feed which is where I learned about both (...)
-
01:17
In reply to All college campus politics Preach it! reply
-
01:15
In reply to March and Rally Held at SF State Despite Police Harassment of Students What in the hell is the SF Commune? Why post to an internationally followed site if you won't take a sentence to to explain these things? No, we don't all live in Oakland! (...)
-
01:12
In reply to Grand Jury Resister Jerry Koch Imprisoned Neither this release nor the "Who Is Jerry?" section of the website that this hyperlinks too explain anywhere I can see what the Grand Jury is investigating. Is this more of the Seattle May Day stuff? Contextualize for the non-scenesters (...)
-
01:01
In reply to Call for Anarchist Participation at March for Monsanto and Response to Delusional National Statement monsanto should make roundup resistant weed. reply
-
00:37
In reply to don't know what I think about this That pic of Wark naked in bed with that chick and that baby is fukkin hilarious! Where'd they get that or did they photoshop him in. reply
-
00:31
In reply to McKenzie Wark's Stunted Publicity http://operationist.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/from-each-according-to-t... reply
-
00:29
In reply to Debord 3D/Wark Good point. Exactly what Wark's critics are saying. reply
-
00:26
In reply to "Can you name a "civilization Nation states arose in the last few centuries, but the first "states" arose in ancient Mesopotamia. This was a fundamentally different kind of social organization than anything else that existed at the time (tribes, chiefdoms etc), and they brought (...)
|
|
Syndication